
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
About TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
Trump refused to sign a bill containing a CBDC ban, surprising markets given his repeated public opposition to CBDCs. Analysts believe the veto reflects clause-level trade-offs that could slow broader crypto market structure legislation. Congress is separately debating whether to grant crypto and fintech firms direct Fed master account access, which would reshape crypto's payment rails. Even under a crypto-friendly administration, legislative progress can hit unexpected friction.
Suosittu
Viimeisin
TrumpVetoesCBDCBill Suositut postaukset
Trump Didn't Veto the CBDC Ban. The Clause Did. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
Trump cancelled the signing of a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030. Same guy who's publicly called a digital dollar a threat to financial freedom. Markets read it as a U-turn.
It isn't. He's holding the bill hostage to get an unrelated elections measure, the SAVE AMERICA ACT, passed first. Classic legislative leverage. The CBDC ban itself cleared the House 358-32 and the Senate 85-5, well above veto-proof margins. Under US law, it becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it while Congress is in session. The ban is likely going through regardless.
What's actually worth watching is the parallel debate on Fed master accounts. Congress is weighing whether crypto and fintech firms should get direct access to the Fed's payment rails via so-called "skinny accounts." The Fed published its formal rulemaking in May; public comments close July 27. If this clears, it would reshape crypto's payment infrastructure far more than any CBDC ban ever could.
The real signal: even under a crypto-friendly administration, legislation doesn't move clean. Clause-level politics slow things down. But the direction hasn't reversed. It's just friction in the details.
Bigger question: which matters more for crypto's long-term footing in the US, blocking CBDCs, or getting direct access to Fed payment rails?
Share your thoughts in the comments 👇 $BTC $SPCX $USDT

On Trump and the CBDC Veto #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
The veto is a defining moment for financial sovereignty versus state control.
The veto isn't about a digital dollar. It's about who gets to architect the rails.
A CBDC, in its purest government-issued form, isn't a currency upgrade. It's programmable sovereignty. The same infrastructure that enables instant settlement also enables programmable expiration, conditional spending, and real-time surveillance of every transaction. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a design feature buried in every central bank white paper on the topic.
Trump's veto signals something the crypto space rarely acknowledges: the battle lines aren't between parties. They're between control and permissionlessness.
The overlooked implication: a CBDC ban in the US doesn't kill the technology. It pushes it underground and offshore. Stablecoins become the default public-private compromise. Privacy chains become the escape valve. And the Fed's research doesn't stop—it rebrands.
The real question no one is asking: if the US formally rejects a CBDC, does that make dollar-pegged stablecoins the de facto digital dollar? And if so, who governs them? Circle and Tether don't have Congressional oversight. But they might get it faster than anyone expects.
This isn't a win for crypto maximalists. It's an opening move in a much longer negotiation about what digital money looks like—and who controls the kill switch.
Not financial advice. A structural observation on the politics of programmable money. $SOL $NES $H
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
TRUMP’S CBDC DECISION JUST REMINDED CRYPTO OF ONE THING: POLITICS MOVES SLOWER THAN NARRATIVES
Many expected a clear signal against CBDCs. Instead, Trump’s refusal to sign a bill containing a CBDC ban has added a new layer of uncertainty to an already complex regulatory landscape.
At first glance, the market saw a contradiction. A politician who has repeatedly criticized CBDCs chose not to approve legislation that included a CBDC restriction. But the deeper story may not be about support or opposition to digital currencies at all.
It may be about priorities.
Analysts suggest the decision reflects broader negotiations surrounding crypto market structure, fintech access to Federal Reserve infrastructure, and the long-term framework that could shape digital finance in the United States.
For crypto investors, this is a reminder that adoption is not determined by headlines alone. Regulation is often built through compromise, and compromise rarely arrives in a straight line.
The most interesting development is not what was blocked today.
It’s what policymakers are still debating behind the scenes: who gets access to the future financial system, how digital assets integrate with traditional banking, and what role blockchain technology will ultimately play in global payments.
My view is that this headline is larger than CBDCs. It highlights the growing reality that crypto is no longer fighting for attention—it is fighting for a place inside the financial architecture of the world’s largest economy.
Markets react to price.
History remembers policy.
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
$TRUMP $BTC $ETH
@OKX中文 @OKX星球 @OKX Orbit
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill: The Man Who Banned CBDCs By Executive Order Just Refused to Sign the Bill That Would Have Made It Law.
The irony is almost too clean to believe.
The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act passed the Senate 85-5 and the House 358-32 — both veto-proof margins. It included the first statutory ban in US history on a Federal Reserve-issued digital dollar, prohibiting any CBDC through December 31, 2030, while explicitly protecting stablecoins that are "open, permissionless, and private." Trump was scheduled to sign it in a ceremony at the US Capitol on June 24. He cancelled the event one hour before it was set to begin. Crypto News
His condition: Congress must first pass the SAVE America Act, a voter-ID and proof-of-citizenship bill that the Senate rejected 48-50 on June 4 — just three weeks earlier, with four Republicans joining every Democrat in opposition. Trump declared the housing bill "of minor importance" and demanded the legislature deliver something it had already voted down. FinancialContent
The constitutional math means the CBDC ban will likely become law anyway. Under the Constitution, a bill presented to the president becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it — provided Congress remains in session. Both chambers passed it by margins far exceeding the two-thirds threshold needed to override a veto. Coinmonitor
The collateral damage is the more urgent story. The CLARITY Act needs a Senate floor vote before the August congressional recess — analysts say preferably by end of June, no later than end of July — to have a realistic chance of becoming law in 2026. Prediction market odds on CLARITY Act passage have already fallen from 74% to 42%. Every day of standoff over the housing bill consumes Senate calendar time the CLARITY Act cannot afford. CryptoSlate
Trump is anti-CBDC. He signed the executive order. He refuses to sign the law. And in doing so, he may have handed the CLARITY Act its most dangerous obstacle yet: time.
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

Worth getting the facts straight: Trump didn't formally veto anything, he canceled the signing ceremony for the bipartisan housing bill that carried a US CBDC ban, reportedly to pressure Congress on a separate elections bill. Net effect for now is the same: the CBDC prohibition is paused, with knock-on implications for the CLARITY Act riding alongside it.
For crypto the symbolism cuts an odd way. Killing a CBDC is broadly what the industry wanted, but stalling the whole bill also delays the market-structure clarity everyone's been waiting on. BTC's at $61.7K, down 1.5%, treating this as noise for now.
My read: bullish on the anti-CBDC signal, frustrating on the legislative delay. Net neutral until the bill actually moves.
NFA, just my read.
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill #OKXOrbit
Trump Didn’t reject the CBDC ban. The process itself is creating the delay.
Trump pulled back from signing a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030, despite repeatedly calling a digital dollar a risk to financial freedom. Some interpreted it as a policy reversal, but the bigger picture suggests otherwise.
The hold-up appears tied to legislative strategy. Reports indicate the administration wants movement on the SAVE AMERICA ACT before advancing the broader package. The CBDC provision itself already passed with overwhelming bipartisan support: 358–32 in the House and 85–5 in the Senate, numbers comfortably above veto-proof levels.
Under current rules, if the president neither signs nor vetoes a bill while Congress remains in session, it can still become law after the required waiting period.
What deserves more attention is the parallel debate around Fed master accounts. Congress is discussing whether crypto and fintech firms should gain direct access to the Federal Reserve payment system through so-called "skinny accounts." If approved, the impact on crypto infrastructure could be much larger than a CBDC ban itself.
The larger takeaway: even in a crypto-friendly environment, legislation rarely moves in a straight line. Direction matters, but so does the friction created by the details.
The bigger question remains: what matters more for crypto’s long-term future in the US — blocking CBDCs or opening direct access to Fed payment rails?
$BTC $SPCX $USDT

ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇
🏛️ The House of Representatives passed the anti-CBDC 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act with an overwhelming vote on Tuesday, sending it to President Donald Trump's desk.
🗳️ Adrian Boafo, a Maryland state delegate backed by the Protect Progress crypto PAC, won the Democratic primary on Tuesday.
🤝 BNB treasury firm CEA Industries entered into a cooperation agreement with YZi Labs, ending months-long governance disputes.
🚀 Cboe Global Markets launched the first binary options products in its new suite called Cboe Predicts.
📁 Voyager investors filed a notice of appeal challenging Judge Roy Altman's dismissal of claims against Mark Cuban and the Dallas Mavericks.
📨 U.S. law enforcement organizations sent a joint letter to the DOJ and the White House, warning of oversight gaps surrounding a key provision in the Clarity Act.
🇯🇵 Japan's SBI Group announced the official launch of its trust bank-backed stablecoin, JPYSC.
📈 21Shares said bitcoin's post-halving price action "still looks familiar," but sees a recovery toward $100,000 by the end of the year.
🏡 Black Lake and Nuva Labs completed what the firms described as the first onchain minting and transfer of $25 million in institutional mortgage loans on Provenance Blockchain.
🐙 Kraken-incubated Ethereum Layer 2 network Ink is upgrading to OP Enterprise Fully Managed in a multi-year deal.
📉 Rolling one-year notional flows across bitcoin investment vehicles fell to -1,176 BTC, the first negative reading since November 2023, according to K33.
#特朗普拒签CBDC法案
Trump vetosi suoraan kyseiseen asuntolakiin.
Lakiesitystä edistivät molemmat puolueet yhdessä, ja se hyväksyttiin edustajainhuoneessa 358 puolesta ja 32 vastaan, kun taas senaatti hyväksyttiin poikkeuksellisen suurella äänellä: 85 puolesta ja 5 vastaan.
Kuitenkin Trumpin kohdalla lakiesitys hylättiin. $BTC
Hänen perustelunsa olivat hyvin suoraviivaiset: hän oli ansainnut miljardeja dollareita kiinteistöillä ja hänellä oli vertaansa vailla oleva ymmärrys markkinoista.
Hän uskoo, että nykyisen asuntojen hintaongelman juurisyy on liian korkeat korot.
Sen ydinvaatimus on vain yksi – korkojen alentaminen mahdollisimman pian.
Hän totesi myös, ettei aio tukahduttaa tavallisia ihmisiä, jotka omistavat omaisuutta eivätkä halua heidän arvojensa laskevan.
Mutta keskeinen seikka on, että tässä lakiesityksessä on ehto, josta kryptovaluutan sisäpiiriläiset ovat erittäin huolissaan.
Tässä määräyksessä todetaan selvästi, että Federal Reserve ei voi lanseerata CBDC:itä (keskuspankkien digitaalisia valuuttoja) ennen vuotta 2030.
Aiemmin tätä pykälää pidettiin alalla laajasti merkittävänä myönteisenä kehityksenä.
Nyt kun lakiesitys on hyllytetty, tämä suotuisa määräys on mitätöity, eikä siihen liittyvät odotukset ole toteutunut.
Trump vaati ehtoa: kongressin on ensin hyväksyttävä hänen Save American Elections Act -lakinsa ennen kuin hän on valmis neuvottelemaan asuntolainsäädännöstä.
Seuraavaksi tarkastellaan markkinatilannetta: BTC:n hinta on tällä hetkellä $60,814, ja se laskee alimmalle tasolle $59,000.
ETH on tällä hetkellä hinnoiteltu 1 613 dollaria, ja alin hinta on 1 552 dollaria.
Pienet kolikot, kuten BEAT, heikkenivät, pudottaen 3,46 %.
BTC:n likvidointitiedot heijastavat merkittävää eroa markkinarahastoissa.
24 tunnin sisällä likvidaatioiden kokonaismäärä saavutti 400 miljoonaa dollaria, mukaan lukien 320 miljoonaa pitkille positioille ja 83,63 miljoonaa dollaria lyhyemmille positioille.
12 tunnin aikana kumulatiiviset likvidaatiot olivat yhteensä 390 miljoonaa dollaria, joista suurin osa oli pitkiä positioita, jotka oli aiemmin pohjakalastettu ja poistettu käytöstä.
Tämä elpyminen on vain pieni elpyminen, ja myyntipaine jumissa olevien osakkeiden vuoksi on edelleen raskasta.
Seuraavaksi puhutaan todellisesta vaikutuksesta kryptovaluuttakauppaamme.
Aiemmin monet uskoivat, ettei Yhdysvallat lanseeraisi CBDC:tä lyhyellä aikavälillä, mutta nyt odotukset ovat kariutuneet ja markkinat ovat menettäneet tärkeän poliittisen tuen.
Trump on kuitenkin toistuvasti vaatinut korkojen laskuja. Jos seuraavia leikkauksia toteutetaan, markkinoiden likviditeetti löystyy, mikä itse asiassa hyödyttäisi Bitcoinia ja Ethereumia.
Tällä hetkellä politiikat ovat täydellisessä umpikujassa, kun sääntely- ja CBDC:hen liittyvät odotukset ovat epäselviä, mikä lisää markkinoille uuden epävarmuuden kerroksen.
Markkina itsessään on juuri kokenut jyrkän laskun; vaikka BTC on hieman elpynyt, pitkien likvidaatioiden mittakaava pysyy korkeana.
Kun politiikat osoittavat tällaisen käänteen, toiminnan on pysyttävä konservatiivisina.
Älä osallistu voimakkaasti uutislähtöisiin trendeihin kuten $BTC $ETH #OKX星球话题来啦
#波动雷达: Seuraa valuuttavaihteluita
Trump kieltäytyi allekirjoittamasta CBDC-lakia
Rehellisesti sanottuna ensimmäinen reaktioni tämän uutisen nähdessä oli helpotus.
CBDC:t ovat yksinkertaisesti sanottuna keskuspankkien digitaalisia valuuttoja. Jos kaikki raha lopulta muuttuu seurattaviksi ja seurattaviksi digitaalisiksi dollareiksi, perinteisten kryptovaluuttojen selviytymistila tulee varmasti ahtaaksi.
Vaikka Trumpin kieltäytyminen allekirjoittaa asiaan liittyviä lakeja on enemmänkin poliittinen juonittelu, se ainakin antaa viestin: Yhdysvalloissa on edelleen merkittäviä jakolinjoja CBDC:iden kehityksestä.
Tällä hetkellä globaalien stablecoinien kokonaismarkkina-arvo on ylittänyt 300 miljardia dollaria, ja pelkkä USDT on lähellä 200 miljardia dollaria. Verrattuna siihen, että hallitus laskee digitaalisia dollareita liikkeeseen suoraan, markkinat ovat selvästi halukkaampia hyväksymään stablecoin-järjestelmän.
Kryptoyhteisölle tämä on mielestäni positiivinen kehitys. Koska todellinen uhka BTC:lle ja kryptoekosysteemille ei ole koskaan ollut sääntelijät, vaan "digitaalisen dollarin" virallinen osallistuminen.
Lyhyen aikavälin vaikutus voi olla rajallinen, mutta pitkällä aikavälillä, jos Yhdysvallat jatkaa CBDC:iden tukahduttamista ja stablecoinien kehityksen tukemista, varat virtaavat todennäköisemmin BTC:hen, ETH:hen ja koko kryptomarkkinoille.
Ainakin toistaiseksi digitaalisen dollarin täysimittainen käyttöönotto on jälleen tauolla.
#特朗普拒签CBDC法案

