刚把 Prosper 这次 p{VAULT} 的活动规则看完。 本来以为又是那种拼命刷交易量的比赛，结果细看之后，规则还真有点不一样。 最关键的一条： Bonding Curve 净买入按 5 倍交易量计算。 外盘交易量才是 1 倍。 这就意味着，单纯来回倒腾意义不大，真正想冲排名，玩法重点其实已经写在规则里了。 整个活动从 9 月 24 日持续到 10 月 1 日，奖池一共 110,000+ PROS。 其中： 前 50 名分 80,000 PROS 达到 1,000 PROS 合格交易量、但没进前 50 的，还能继续参与 20,000 PROS 的分配 TopNod 另外还有 10,000 PROS 抽奖 我比较喜欢的一点是，没有挤进前 50 也不代表白做。 至少还有 Qualified Trader Pool 这一层，相比那种只有头部几个钱包能吃到奖励的活动，对普通用户稍微友好一点。 不过别想着对刷。 即时卖回、关联钱包、异常资金路径、女巫地址这些，最后都会审核，排行榜上的数字也不等于最终奖励。 所以我的思路很简单： 先把产品跑一遍 、顺手做真实交易 、能进榜就冲一下 进不了榜就看能不能达到 Qualified Trader 的门槛 Prosper 第一轮 p{VAULT} Trading Challenge，先上场再说。 Genesis 往往就是从第一批愿意动手的人开始的。 官方推特：@ProsperTicker @pharos_network

Nearly 100 million dollars is difficult, Ripple says it cannot freeze the $83 million XRP stolen from Bitget in a hacker attack Planet Daily reports that the cryptocurrency exchange Bitget was recently severely attacked by hackers, resulting in the theft of XRP worth up to $83 million. On-chain data analysis shows that the hackers acted quickly after the incident, completing large transfers of funds across addresses. Bitget has confirmed this major security incident and is cooperating with the police in the investigation. Regarding asset recovery, Ripple responded that due to the decentralized design of the underlying XRP blockchain, the company has no technical means to forcibly freeze specific external accounts, even if law enforcement agencies intervene. This means that the recovery of the stolen funds will be entirely the responsibility of Bitget and its contracted security team. (CoinDesk)

Bitget announced that it will gradually resume withdrawals starting from September 28 and said that the related security vulnerabilities have been fully fixed. There's no other way; everyone is anxious but it's useless. Let's wait until 16:00 Beijing time on the 28th. On that day, only BTC network withdrawals will be allowed; other chains will be gradually opened day by day. Most tokens, fiat currencies, and P2P withdrawals will have to wait until the evening of October 2. It feels like cautiously crossing a river by feeling the stones, as if the confidence is still not very strong. Comparing the #BitgetTheftIncident and the Bybit theft incident, the two are obviously vastly different. The biggest difference is that Bybit firmly resisted pressure and clearly refused to stop withdrawals, not stopping withdrawals for even a second. Its CEO @benbybit showed amazing boldness and confidence, quickly stabilizing the situation, and even turning the misfortune into a great advertisement showcasing Bybit's strong strength and trustworthy reputation. In contrast, Bitget chose to immediately close withdrawals after the theft. The difference between the two is like heaven and earth. Another difference is that Bybit only had an issue with the ETH single chain. After the incident, @Bybit_ZH almost immediately investigated, identified, and announced the cause of the theft, and the vulnerability was promptly patched. Withdrawals continued as usual during this period. Bitget, however, had tokens on almost all chains stolen in one go. After the incident, Bitget seemed a bit confused and has not yet announced a clear cause, only stating that the vulnerability has been fixed. But the reopening of withdrawals is still being done cautiously and in phases. So it still causes some concern—whether all security vulnerabilities have truly been eliminated, whether hackers might invade again after withdrawals reopen, causing the situation to spiral out of control and withdrawals to be stopped again. That would be troublesome.

At times like this, stability outweighs everything; it is indeed inappropriate to delist tokens, which only adds confusion. Bitcoin Rune DOG: Significant price deviation appeared on Bitget, calling for the restoration of spot trading. According to BlockBeats news on September 26, Leonidas, a core figure of the Bitcoin Rune DOG community, wrote a long letter to Bitget CEO Gracy Chen, stating that it was highly unusual for the trading platform to announce the delisting of DOG just hours after a hacker attack while withdrawals were still frozen. The delisting announcement, combined with the inability to withdraw and the trust crisis following the hacker incident, caused significant price deviation of DOG on Bitget, resulting in losses for users who have been trading the token on the exchange for a long time. Leonidas stated that DOG has a market value exceeding 100 million USD, has been traded on Bitget for two and a half years with a cumulative trading volume exceeding 1 billion USD, and the community size is much larger than many small tokens still listed on the exchange. On behalf of the community, he formally requested Bitget to restore spot trading to fix the abnormal market conditions, while wishing the exchange a swift recovery of the stolen assets and proper handling of the aftermath of the hacker incident. $DOGS

The most annoying thing is holidays. Originally, I was unemployed, and mixing in Web3 means every day feels like a holiday. But when Mid-Autumn Festival, National Day, and other holidays come around, all my relatives and friends have time off and want to gather. That's the most exhausting part— a bunch of people you barely see all year get together and don't know what to say, pretending to be close, racking your brain to find something to talk about. Then if you accidentally say the wrong thing, you upset someone and they hold a grudge. It's really damn tiring. After one gathering, you rush to the next, turning me into a full-time office worker 😅

Still need to be cautious. If the exact cause of the theft is not found, once withdrawals are reopened, hackers might rush in even before users can withdraw, and the situation will be completely out of control. Being forced to close withdrawals again would deal an even bigger blow to the reputation! Bitget's August 2026 Protection Fund report released on September 14 shows that the fund's highest valuation that month was $441 million, the lowest was $345 million, and the average was $382 million. Just now, Bitget's CEO posted that the stolen funds have been revised to $387.5 million! So the situation is severe and must not be taken lightly.

#USDD's Mid-Autumn gift box🎁 surprisingly includes a stylish camping stove with a foldable stand. Take the stove out for a picnic during Mid-Autumn, enjoy your meal while admiring the moon, and casually figure out how to get rich — this is how a festival should be celebrated 😊 There are also exquisite mooncakes, full of heartfelt wishes 😻, really grateful to @usddio_cn @USDDecentralize $USDD has always been steady and reliable, and the Smart Allocator's yield strategy is also very attractive! 🚀 Happy Mid-Autumn Festival! 🌕

Bitget hacked! The attacker has converted most of the stolen funds on the EVM chain into 67,982 ETH, worth approximately $183 million On September 25, according to Lookonchain monitoring, Bitget was hacked, with about $351.6 million in assets stolen. The hacker has converted most of the stolen funds on the EVM chain into 67,982 ETH, valued at about $183 million. On-chain monitoring shows about $180 million to $183 million in assets transferred out from multiple Bitget-tagged addresses, involving ETH, BNB, AVAX, USDT0, USDC, USDT, and XAUT assets. After funds were consolidated into a main address, they were then dispersed to at least 6 addresses. Among them, a newly created address used 19.67 million USDT0 from Bitget's hot wallet to buy 7,111 ETH within about 6 minutes via UniswapX and 1inch Fusion, with some transaction prices about 5% higher than the spot market. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen has held a public live broadcast regarding this incident, but so far, the official has not released a written version of the new investigation conclusions. $ZEC