#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

‏‎489.5 ألف‏ من المشاهدات|‏‎83‏ منشور

About TrumpVetoesCBDCBill

Trump refused to sign a bill containing a CBDC ban, surprising markets given his repeated public opposition to CBDCs. Analysts believe the veto reflects clause-level trade-offs that could slow broader crypto market structure legislation. Congress is separately debating whether to grant crypto and fintech firms direct Fed master account access, which would reshape crypto's payment rails. Even under a crypto-friendly administration, legislative progress can hit unexpected friction.

TrumpVetoesCBDCBill المنشورات الشائعة

TBNG_OKX
TBNG_OKX
Trump Didn't Veto the CBDC Ban. The Clause Did. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill Trump cancelled the signing of a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030. Same guy who's publicly called a digital dollar a threat to financial freedom. Markets read it as a U-turn. It isn't. He's holding the bill hostage to get an unrelated elections measure, the SAVE AMERICA ACT, passed first. Classic legislative leverage. The CBDC ban itself cleared the House 358-32 and the Senate 85-5, well above veto-proof margins. Under US law, it becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it while Congress is in session. The ban is likely going through regardless. What's actually worth watching is the parallel debate on Fed master accounts. Congress is weighing whether crypto and fintech firms should get direct access to the Fed's payment rails via so-called "skinny accounts." The Fed published its formal rulemaking in May; public comments close July 27. If this clears, it would reshape crypto's payment infrastructure far more than any CBDC ban ever could. The real signal: even under a crypto-friendly administration, legislation doesn't move clean. Clause-level politics slow things down. But the direction hasn't reversed. It's just friction in the details. Bigger question: which matters more for crypto's long-term footing in the US, blocking CBDCs, or getting direct access to Fed payment rails? Share your thoughts in the comments 👇 $BTC $SPCX $USDT
VINLU
VINLU
On Trump and the CBDC Veto #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill The veto is a defining moment for financial sovereignty versus state control. The veto isn't about a digital dollar. It's about who gets to architect the rails. A CBDC, in its purest government-issued form, isn't a currency upgrade. It's programmable sovereignty. The same infrastructure that enables instant settlement also enables programmable expiration, conditional spending, and real-time surveillance of every transaction. That's not a conspiracy theory. That's a design feature buried in every central bank white paper on the topic. Trump's veto signals something the crypto space rarely acknowledges: the battle lines aren't between parties. They're between control and permissionlessness. The overlooked implication: a CBDC ban in the US doesn't kill the technology. It pushes it underground and offshore. Stablecoins become the default public-private compromise. Privacy chains become the escape valve. And the Fed's research doesn't stop—it rebrands. The real question no one is asking: if the US formally rejects a CBDC, does that make dollar-pegged stablecoins the de facto digital dollar? And if so, who governs them? Circle and Tether don't have Congressional oversight. But they might get it faster than anyone expects. This isn't a win for crypto maximalists. It's an opening move in a much longer negotiation about what digital money looks like—and who controls the kill switch. Not financial advice. A structural observation on the politics of programmable money. $SOL $NES $H
Blue sky ✅
Blue sky ✅
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill TRUMP’S CBDC DECISION JUST REMINDED CRYPTO OF ONE THING: POLITICS MOVES SLOWER THAN NARRATIVES Many expected a clear signal against CBDCs. Instead, Trump’s refusal to sign a bill containing a CBDC ban has added a new layer of uncertainty to an already complex regulatory landscape. At first glance, the market saw a contradiction. A politician who has repeatedly criticized CBDCs chose not to approve legislation that included a CBDC restriction. But the deeper story may not be about support or opposition to digital currencies at all. It may be about priorities. Analysts suggest the decision reflects broader negotiations surrounding crypto market structure, fintech access to Federal Reserve infrastructure, and the long-term framework that could shape digital finance in the United States. For crypto investors, this is a reminder that adoption is not determined by headlines alone. Regulation is often built through compromise, and compromise rarely arrives in a straight line. The most interesting development is not what was blocked today. It’s what policymakers are still debating behind the scenes: who gets access to the future financial system, how digital assets integrate with traditional banking, and what role blockchain technology will ultimately play in global payments. My view is that this headline is larger than CBDCs. It highlights the growing reality that crypto is no longer fighting for attention—it is fighting for a place inside the financial architecture of the world’s largest economy. Markets react to price. History remembers policy. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill $TRUMP $BTC $ETH @OKX中文 @OKX星球 @OKX Orbit
Renee_OKX
Renee_OKX
#TrumpVetoesCBDCBill: The Man Who Banned CBDCs By Executive Order Just Refused to Sign the Bill That Would Have Made It Law. The irony is almost too clean to believe. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act passed the Senate 85-5 and the House 358-32 — both veto-proof margins. It included the first statutory ban in US history on a Federal Reserve-issued digital dollar, prohibiting any CBDC through December 31, 2030, while explicitly protecting stablecoins that are "open, permissionless, and private." Trump was scheduled to sign it in a ceremony at the US Capitol on June 24. He cancelled the event one hour before it was set to begin. Crypto News His condition: Congress must first pass the SAVE America Act, a voter-ID and proof-of-citizenship bill that the Senate rejected 48-50 on June 4 — just three weeks earlier, with four Republicans joining every Democrat in opposition. Trump declared the housing bill "of minor importance" and demanded the legislature deliver something it had already voted down. FinancialContent The constitutional math means the CBDC ban will likely become law anyway. Under the Constitution, a bill presented to the president becomes law automatically after 10 days if he neither signs nor vetoes it — provided Congress remains in session. Both chambers passed it by margins far exceeding the two-thirds threshold needed to override a veto. Coinmonitor The collateral damage is the more urgent story. The CLARITY Act needs a Senate floor vote before the August congressional recess — analysts say preferably by end of June, no later than end of July — to have a realistic chance of becoming law in 2026. Prediction market odds on CLARITY Act passage have already fallen from 74% to 42%. Every day of standoff over the housing bill consumes Senate calendar time the CLARITY Act cannot afford. CryptoSlate Trump is anti-CBDC. He signed the executive order. He refuses to sign the law. And in doing so, he may have handed the CLARITY Act its most dangerous obstacle yet: time. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill
Birdie_OKX
Birdie_OKX
Worth getting the facts straight: Trump didn't formally veto anything, he canceled the signing ceremony for the bipartisan housing bill that carried a US CBDC ban, reportedly to pressure Congress on a separate elections bill. Net effect for now is the same: the CBDC prohibition is paused, with knock-on implications for the CLARITY Act riding alongside it. For crypto the symbolism cuts an odd way. Killing a CBDC is broadly what the industry wanted, but stalling the whole bill also delays the market-structure clarity everyone's been waiting on. BTC's at $61.7K, down 1.5%, treating this as noise for now. My read: bullish on the anti-CBDC signal, frustrating on the legislative delay. Net neutral until the bill actually moves. NFA, just my read. #TrumpVetoesCBDCBill #OKXOrbit
𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐋𝐚𝐫𝐚✨
𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐤 𝐋𝐚𝐫𝐚✨
Trump Didn’t reject the CBDC ban. The process itself is creating the delay. Trump pulled back from signing a bill that included a CBDC ban through 2030, despite repeatedly calling a digital dollar a risk to financial freedom. Some interpreted it as a policy reversal, but the bigger picture suggests otherwise. The hold-up appears tied to legislative strategy. Reports indicate the administration wants movement on the SAVE AMERICA ACT before advancing the broader package. The CBDC provision itself already passed with overwhelming bipartisan support: 358–32 in the House and 85–5 in the Senate, numbers comfortably above veto-proof levels. Under current rules, if the president neither signs nor vetoes a bill while Congress remains in session, it can still become law after the required waiting period. What deserves more attention is the parallel debate around Fed master accounts. Congress is discussing whether crypto and fintech firms should gain direct access to the Federal Reserve payment system through so-called "skinny accounts." If approved, the impact on crypto infrastructure could be much larger than a CBDC ban itself. The larger takeaway: even in a crypto-friendly environment, legislation rarely moves in a straight line. Direction matters, but so does the friction created by the details. The bigger question remains: what matters more for crypto’s long-term future in the US — blocking CBDCs or opening direct access to Fed payment rails? $BTC $SPCX $USDT
Crypto India
Crypto India
🚨 JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Trump says he will not sign the housing bill, which temporarily bans CBDC, unless Congress passes the “SAVE America Act.” The delay could spill over and slow progress on the Crypto CLARITY Act.
James Hunt
James Hunt
ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇 🏛️ The House of Representatives passed the anti-CBDC 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act with an overwhelming vote on Tuesday, sending it to President Donald Trump's desk. 🗳️ Adrian Boafo, a Maryland state delegate backed by the Protect Progress crypto PAC, won the Democratic primary on Tuesday. 🤝 BNB treasury firm CEA Industries entered into a cooperation agreement with YZi Labs, ending months-long governance disputes. 🚀 Cboe Global Markets launched the first binary options products in its new suite called Cboe Predicts. 📁 Voyager investors filed a notice of appeal challenging Judge Roy Altman's dismissal of claims against Mark Cuban and the Dallas Mavericks. 📨 U.S. law enforcement organizations sent a joint letter to the DOJ and the White House, warning of oversight gaps surrounding a key provision in the Clarity Act. 🇯🇵 Japan's SBI Group announced the official launch of its trust bank-backed stablecoin, JPYSC. 📈 21Shares said bitcoin's post-halving price action "still looks familiar," but sees a recovery toward $100,000 by the end of the year. 🏡 Black Lake and Nuva Labs completed what the firms described as the first onchain minting and transfer of $25 million in institutional mortgage loans on Provenance Blockchain. 🐙 Kraken-incubated Ethereum Layer 2 network Ink is upgrading to OP Enterprise Fully Managed in a multi-year deal. 📉 Rolling one-year notional flows across bitcoin investment vehicles fell to -1,176 BTC, the first negative reading since November 2023, according to K33.
bingo(互动版)
bingo(互动版)
#特朗普拒签CBDC法案 استخدم ترامب حق النقض المباشر ضد ذلك القانون السكني. تم الترويج المشترك لمشروع القانون من قبل الحزبين وأقر في مجلس النواب ب 358 صوتا مؤيدا و32 ضد، بينما أقر مجلس الشيوخ بأصوات عالية استثنائية بلغت 85 صوتا مؤيدا و5 ضد. ومع ذلك، عندما يتعلق الأمر بترامب، تم تأجيل مشروع القانون. $BTC كان سببه مباشرا جدا: فقد ربح مليارات الدولارات من العقارات وكان لديه فهم لا مثيل له للسوق. يعتقد أن السبب الجذري لمشكلة أسعار المنازل الحالية يكمن في أسعار الفائدة المرتفعة جدا. وطلبها الأساسي هو واحد فقط — خفض أسعار الفائدة في أقرب وقت ممكن. كما صرح بأنه لن يقمع الأشخاص العاديين الذين يمتلكون ممتلكات ولا يريدون أن تنخفض قيمة ممتلكاتهم. لكن النقطة الأساسية هي أن هذا القانون يحتوي على بند يثير قلق المطلعين على العملات الرقمية بشدة. ينص هذا البند بوضوح على أن الاحتياطي الفيدرالي لا يمكنه إطلاق العملات الرقمية للبنك المركزي (CBDCs) قبل عام 2030. في السابق، كان هذا البند يعتبر على نطاق واسع داخل الصناعة تطورا إيجابيا كبيرا. الآن بعد أن تم تأجيل مشروع القانون، تم إلغاء هذا النص الإيجابي، ولم تتحقق التوقعات ذات الصلة. أصر ترامب على شرط: يجب على الكونغرس أولا تمرير قانون إنقاذ الانتخابات الأمريكية قبل أن يكون مستعدا للتفاوض على مشروع قانون الإسكان. بعد ذلك، دعونا ننظر إلى وضع السوق: سعر البيتكوين حاليا عند 60,814 دولار، متراجعا إلى أدنى مستوى عند 59,000 دولار. سعر ETH حاليا عند 1,613 دولار، مع أدنى سعر عند 1,552 دولار. أما العملات الصغيرة مثل BEAT فقد ضعفت، حيث انخفضت بنسبة 3.46٪. تعكس بيانات تصفية BTC اختلافا كبيرا في صناديق السوق. خلال 24 ساعة، بلغت التصفيات الإجمالية 400 مليون دولار، بما في ذلك 320 مليون دولار للمراكز الطويلة و83.63 مليون دولار للمراكز المكشوفة. في 12 ساعة، بلغ إجمالي عمليات التصفية 390 مليون دولار، وكانت الغالبية العظمى منها مراكز طويلة تم صيدها سابقا وتم القضاء عليها. هذا التعافي هو مجرد تعافي طفيف، ولا يزال ضغط البيع من الأسهم المحاصرة ثقيلا. بعد ذلك، دعونا نتحدث عن التأثير الفعلي على تداول العملات الرقمية لدينا. في السابق، كان الكثيرون يراهنا بأن الولايات المتحدة لن تطلق عملا للبنك المركزي (CBDC) على المدى القصير، لكن الآن هذا التوقع قد تراجع، وفقد السوق دعما سياسيا مهما. ومع ذلك، دعا ترامب مرارا إلى خفض أسعار الفائدة. إذا تم تنفيذ تخفيضات لاحقة، فسيتم تخفيف سيولة السوق، مما سيعود بالنفع فعليا على البيتكوين والإيثيريوم. حاليا، السياسات في حالة مأزق تام، مع أن التوقعات التنظيمية والمتعلقة بالعملات الرقمية الرقمية أصبحت غامضة، مما يضيف طبقة أخرى من عدم اليقين إلى السوق. شهد السوق نفسه تراجعا حادا؛ حتى مع ارتداد طفيف في البيتكوين، لا يزال حجم التصفيات الطويلة مرتفعا. عندما تظهر السياسات هذا الانعكاس، يجب أن تظل العمليات محافظة. لا تشارك بشكل كبير في الاتجاهات الإخبارية مثل $BTC $ETH #OKX星球话题来啦 #波动雷达: مراقبة تقلبات العملة
一个小青禾
一个小青禾
رفض ترامب توقيع مشروع قانون CBDC بصراحة، كان رد فعلي الأول عندما رأيت هذا الخبر هو الارتياح. العملات الرقمية الرقمية (CBDCs) هي عملات رقمية للبنوك المركزية. إذا أصبحت كل الأموال في النهاية دولارات رقمية قابلة للتتبع والمراقبة، فسيتم بالتأكيد ضيق مساحة البقاء للعملات الرقمية التقليدية. على الرغم من أن رفض ترامب توقيع مشاريع قوانين ذات صلة هو مناورة سياسية أكثر، إلا أنه على الأقل يرسل إشارة: لا تزال هناك انقسامات كبيرة داخل الولايات المتحدة حول تقدم العملات الرقمية للبنون المركزية. حاليا، تجاوزت القيمة السوقية الإجمالية للعملات المستقرة العالمية 300 مليار دولار، مع اقتراب USDT وحده من 200 مليار دولار. مقارنة بإصدار الحكومة للدولارات الرقمية مباشرة، فإن السوق أكثر استعدادا لقبول نظام العملات المستقرة. بالنسبة لمجتمع العملات الرقمية، أعتقد أن هذا تطور إيجابي. لأن التهديد الحقيقي للبيتكوين ونظام العملات الرقمية لم يكن أبدا من الجهات التنظيمية، بل التدخل الرسمي ل "الدولار الرقمي". قد يكون التأثير قصير المدى محدودا، لكن على المدى الطويل، إذا استمرت الولايات المتحدة في كبح العملات الرقمية المركزية ودعم تطوير العملات المستقرة، فمن المرجح أن تتدفق الأموال إلى BTC وETH وسوق العملات المشفرة بأكمله. على الأقل في الوقت الحالي، تم تأجيل التطبيق الكامل للدولار الرقمي مرة أخرى. #特朗普拒签CBDC法案